Dear Mr.Cornwell, Firstly I'd like to say I am absolutely in love with your work, and I've read your Winter King series so much that the covers are now falling off the books. At the moment I am a twelfth grade student doing a ISP on Historical Fiction and I've chosen your Winter King series to be my example. I'd really like to know your opinion on how the fictionalization of history helps the readers understand the realities i.e. emotions, of the time period. I'm not asking you as a source for my paper, as it is mostly written at this point, but out of curiosity because you happen to be my favourite author. Thank you very much for your time. Stacey McDonald
Perhaps by making it more real? I'm not saying that 'real' (i.e. non-fictional) history is not real, but historians cannot go beyond the evidence. They can suggest things, but they always have to stick to hard, cold facts, and as much of history lacks hard, cold facts there are gaps. Novelists can fill those gaps and, perhaps, by making the past very vivid and immediate help folk understand what it was like to live back then. But it's no replacement for the real thing. An historical novelist is not, or should not be, a history teacher - he or she should be a storyteller. But if the books bring history alive then that ain't a bad thing.