Mr. Cornwell,

I’ve been an avid reader of yours for many years. I recently finished the  Warlord Chronicles and have a question about your historical notes. In all of the books and media I’ve read, and actual conversations with historians about Arthurian legend, I’ve never heard anyone mention Geoffrey Ashe’s 1985 book “The Discovery of King Arthur.” I realize that historians would not consider it a scholarly work, but he does seem to make a compelling argument for the identity of an historical Arthur. Is his argument so uncredible among historians that it doesn’t merit mention? I would love to know your opinion.

Thank you for your wonderful books. I hope to continue reading them for many years!
Al Fraioli