Bulletin Board

Q

Dear Bernard Cornwell, I have just finnished Sharpe's Waterloo and have read all the series nearly from Christmas day till now 09/04, The only thing that has saddened me is how different that the Sharpe series portrayed Sharpe from the actual books, And if I could make a suggestion is that after reading Sharpe's Waterloo I think there should have been another book written about Sharpe in charge of the Prince of Wales own Volunteers as there CO and how he was discharged in the end before he went on the voyage in Sharpe's Triumph. That's not to say that I didn't enjoy the books and could read them again and again thank you Bernard. Trevor Wright . Brisbane Australia but of Ashford Kent UK.

A

There could well be such a book! I have been keeping in reserve the fighting that occurred after Waterloo and before the French surrender . . . wait!


Q

The Sharpe books are fantastic, my favourite one is Sharpe's Eagle. I have got all the films and 16 of the 20 books, the 4 I havent got are Sharpe's Company, Enemy, Revenge and Gold and I'm getting those soon . I have read them and re-read them and they are definitely my favourite books. Yours faithfully, Michael

A

Thanks Michael - good to hear from you!


Q

Dear Mr Cornwell After joining my now good friend Richard Sharpe in India watching him kill the Tippoo sultan, helping avoid Hakeswill, watching him being flogged for a crime he did not comit being there when he met Harper and the scuffle that broke out between them, the taking of the eagle at Talavera with Harper, sailing to help Nelson at Trafalger. We've been to France, Spain, Portugal and Holland together drinking, eating and having fun with the fairer sex. I've faced French Voltigers, stood in line and fought off the French colums, formed square when being attacked by the French cavalry, the loading and reloading of my Baker rifle with Sharpe and Harper beside me surounded by others like Hagman, Perkins and Harris, the pain in my arm as I fired Harper's nock volley gun. I was just wondering when and where do we march again as I have just finished reading the Sharpe series. I await eagerly for you to give Hogan our orders so we can all march again and a big thank you for a year of enjoyable reading and history lessons. A big fan, David King

A

The next Sharpe book, Sharpe's Fury, will be released in October of this year where I hope you will join Sharpe and Harper in Cadiz.


Q

Per the comments on the regimental system. The British Army has always had a regimental system which was administrative and esprit oriented. Each of the regiments had an adminstrative and training headquarters located in Great Britain. Depending on the war, the regiments would raise various numbered battalions, which would be assigned to brigades. The brigades weren't permanent organizations. The brigades were assigned to divisions, which also weren't permanent organizations. As wars and campaigns came and went the higher numbered battalions and the brigades and divisions came and went also. The US Army and Marines started off with a permanent regimental system. Occasionally a regiment was renamed, but depending on the war the regiments were designed to at least last during the duration of the war. While the number of troops, companies and batteries would vary during the centuries, normally there were twelve of each to a regiment. During a war the regiments normally served with all companies, typically organizind twelve companies into 3 battalions or squadrons(cavalry) During the Civil war Or the War Between the States or even the War of Northern Agression, the US Army grouped regiments into brigades, which usually were permanent during the war. The brigades were then organized into divisions\corps\grand armies, but these weren't very permanent. Brigades were often swapped between the divisions. Some states refused to send replacements to their regiments, raising new ones instead. Those states often merged older regiments with few men left into newer regiments. The US Army always sent replacements to its regiments as the number of regiments was closely controlled by Congress. After the Civil war, the brigades\divisions\corps etc were disbanded and never re-organized as such with the old names. During the First World War, all regiments were formed into permanent Divisions\Corps\Armies During the Second World War the Army found that regiments weren't always the best size of men to deploy. They might not want to deploy twelve companies with no attached artillery. Yet a brigade might be too big for a job. They formed task forces and regimental combat teams. After Korea, the army redesigned all combat units, effectively eliminating the regiment of twelve companies with battle groups of 5 companies. This only lasted about 5 years, then the Army went to what amounts to the existing system. The historical Divisions were maintained. The 3 regiments were replaced with 3 brigades. Each brigade had 3-4 infantry/armor battalions, an artillery battalion, and various other companies/battalions depending on its mission. To maintain esprit and not lose the history of the old regiments, each battalion was assigned a name& number relating to its predecessor regiment. Thus the First Cavalry Division has various Cavalry battalions/squadrons such as the 1st battalion Seventh Cavalry. The brigades these battalions belong to can easily change but the battalion tends to keep its name and traditions. About every 20 years the Army does change this organization, but in general, the Army is comprised of Battalions and Divisions. There's no Regimental headquarters as such, except for a few Armored Cavalry regiments. The Marines continue to maintain permanent regiments, assigned to permanent divisions. However their regiments are broken down into permanent battalions, so you can get the 2nd battalion, 1st Marine regiment Confusing. And one really needs to know what year in time, in order to know what comprised the 1st battalion of the 1st Infantry regiment. Don Conrad


Q

Dear Bernard Cornwell, The Duke of Marlborough is another exception, a brillian one, to the rule of good military administrators being less than stellar field commanders. But you are probably right about his being a poor subject for fiction. It was a career that seems to beggar invention. I believe I recall from Henry Steele Commager's condensation of Churchill's biography that a corporal [William?] Bishop kept a diary and wrote a bit of doggerel on Marlborough's dismissal as Captain General of the Grand Alliance against Louis XIV-- God and the solder all men adore At the brink of war, but not before. The danger past, both are alike requited, God forgot and the brave soldier slighted. I look forward to The Lords of the North. Tom Anderson

A

I think Marlborough's wars would make a terrific series of books . . . but somehow I've never got hooked, though I do enjoy reading about it. I heard on the grapevine that someone is starting such a series - I won't say who, in case it isn't true, but I hope it is.


Q

Just wanted to say thank you for the many hours of deep pleasure that your books have given me. At my advancing years (56 and 3/4 !) it takes a lot to perk my interest - your works have constantly and invariably done so. There are very few people who can present a story with convincing characters and very plausible plots as your goodself. Superb! I particularly enjoyed the Arthur series and the Grail Quest - I have reread them at least four times and each time discover the plot and complex characters afresh. Superb. Your latest series of the Saxon years threatens to surpass it - can't wait for June!! Please keep up the excellent work. Best Regards, John Cooper


Q

Dear Bernard, I have been living in Germany for 16 years. In a way I feel like an exile from my own country even though I am married with a 13 year old son. My wife is a Bavarian and thus, as my father was a Scot, my Son is half Bavarian and half Scottish. When I read your Sharpe books, so far 16 books, I am transported to another time. Not only do I love the exploits of Richard but I love the historical content. My son, regretably, is not an avid reader, so I tell him about the exploits so vividly told in your books and am able to tell him about the history of the times. Thus your books are not only a wonderful read but they are also great for teaching my son about history. You are extreemly kind to the Scots, epecially in the India campaigns and I must say that this makes me proud as it does my son. Please keep Sharpe alive as long as possible. Thank you for the hours and hours you have been able to transport me into a past so full of exitement, it has made a part of my exile so much more pleasant. Yours sincerely Glyn Ross Walker


Q

Thanks for the great reading AND the TV series. I have done both many times, since each is a distinctly enjoyable but very different experience. I make a plea for all the hearing impaired , like myself, that you use any influence you have to get the Sharpe videos closed captioned. If so , I would buy another set. I thank you immensely for the terrific historical fiction. Dr Jim Baker in San Diego

A

I shall pass your plea onto the producers today - you're absolutely right, of course, and they should be closed captioned and I promise to do my best to persuade them of that.


Q

Hi Bernard, Please excuse the informal approach but I feel that, through your books, I "know" you. Whilst not a fan I do admire your books. I do hope that this next piece will not be considered to be spam, so here goes. I noticed a mention of George Shipway in your Q & A section so I hope that which follows will be of interest. I'm a recent member of RomanArmyTalk and have initiated a topic in praise of George Shipway's "Imperial Governor" you can read my efforts here. http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?t=7148. You will also find perhaps the most complete biography of George Shipway ever written amongst many other topics. Thank you for reading this and please continue to thrill us with your writing. Regards Jim Poulton

A

Thanks for letting us know!


Q

I recently read The Last Kingdom and have almost finished The Pale Horseman. I am looking forward to the next book. I have long been interested in Alfred and have enjoyed your stories greatly. Thank you so much. I look forward to reading more of your books in the future. Linda