Your Questions

Q

I have a question regarding the Grail series I've been wondering about since I finished the books. It has been a long time since I read the books and I hope you know what I'm referring to but I believe in Vagabond Thomas is tortured by the inquisitor who only uses fire and brands. If I remember correctly it was said inquisitors were only allowed to use fire becuase it did not draw blood. I'm wondering was this the guidlines all inquisitors were given or was it just a story telling device? I can't resist and forgive my flattery but I want you to know those books created a swarm of warm memories I will not forget. I enjoyed every passing hour immersed in those books.
Daniel Morin

A

Inquisitors were priests (or monks, churchmen, anyway), and churchmen were forbidden to draw blood - I'm not sure I can provide chapter and verse on that, but I'm fairly sure that was right - the answer, of course, was to use laymen!


Q

Dear Bernard In regards to future projects most of your books cover soldiers on land but have you ever considered a Naval series.Admittedly the Napoelonic wars have been done to death but have you ever thought of the 3 Anglo/Dutch wars of 1600's. The Dutch were a much tougher enemy than the French Navy and those wars in a way were descisve since ended Dutch domination of the sea's and bought about British control.

BTW In noticed in Fury that Sharpe apart from killing the odd person in battle (where its fair) is remarkbly restrained and does not really kill anyone. Has Sharpe gone soft???? BTW If you ever write about the Siege of Burgos have you ever considered bringing Hakeswill back one last time to make Sharpe's life a misery??
Geraint

A

I doubt I'll ever write another naval story - they're incredibly difficult because you can't shift characters out of each other's way - they're all stuck on board a ship. Writing Sharpe's Trafalgar hugely increased my respect for CS Forester and Patrick O'Brian.

I think constantly of bringing Hakeswill back. Sharpe gone soft? You think so? I don't think he'll like that.


Q

I have just read all 3 of the "Uthred" Saxon Novels in a week! My wife bought me The Pale Horesman as a present and fortunately my father in law had the other 2 so I was able to read them in sequence. Incidently he has probably read everyone of your books and owns copies of most ( I must ask him if he has any early Sharpe's)? Anyway the reason for contacting you, other than to say how much I enjoyed the books is to see how long one will have to wait for the 4th in the series? Many thanks. Bamber Price

I have just bought and read The Last Kingdom,The Pale Horseman and The Lords of the North in hardback.I thoroughly enjoyed all three and there is a hint of the storyline continuing.I know The Lords of the North has only just been published here in the UK but I was wondering if another chapter in the story is been written when is it likely to appear on the bookshelves? Great entertainment, many thanks,best wishes, Gary Hall.

A

The fourth book of the Saxon series will - hopefully! - be published in October 2007.


Q

Hi Mr. Cornwell, I would just like to say a big thank you for signing my books in Plymouth last Wednesday - you might remember me, I had an old edition of Sharpe's Eagle, and I think you said something along the lines of "I can't remember this one at all". I also have a question. I have just finished Sharpe's Gold, where Sharpe meets his old friend, Tom Garrard - is this the last time we see Tom, or is he killed in the destruction at Almeida? Many thanks.

Jamie Kearns

A

He meets him again - read on!


Q

Dear Bernard, I am writing to inquire of the United Kingdom's military ranks back in the days of Sharpe. I've been doing google searches for it for quite some time, but haven't been provided with the answers I'm searching for. I was mainly wondering what the next advancement is from sergeant. Also, I was wondering about the rank of an ensign. Would that be above or below sergeant? Thank you for the help! -Pim P.

A

Ensign: Lowest of the low, doesn't really command anything except at the whim of his superiors. In the Rifles he's called a Second Lieutenant.
Lieutenant: Still fairly lowly, subordinate in a company to a Captain
Captain: Probably one of the best ranks. A captain commands a company (each battalion is divided into ten companies, so a company will have anything from 50 to 100 men)
Major: Getting impressive now. Ostensibly a Major commands half a battalion, but they're really there to assist the battalion commander and be ready to take over if he's killed.
Lieutenant Colonel: He commands the battalion. He's god.

Those are the officers with the battalions, but above them are:

Colonel: He's a bit of nothing really. Not senior enough to be a general and too senior to command a battalion, but he might well be given some specific responsibility - commanding troops from more than one battalion to guard an outpost or attack some small objective.

Then come the Generals - in ascending order, and the higher you get the more units might fall under your command.
Brigadier General
Major General
Lieutenant General
General

and at the very top

Field Marshal - who really is god.

Hope that helps!


Q

Dear Mr Cornwell, I am a great fan of your writing and through the Sharpe books you have ignited a dormant interest in antique weapons, but may I ask an unrelated question, in the Pale Horsemen, english version, is the picture of the hill fort just that, a picture drawn or is it an aerial photograph? Graham Reinelt

A

It's taken from an aerial photograph - so it's accurate - the place really hasn't changed much from Alfred's day (except for the road and the small car park).


Q

Hi Bernard, Firstly I would like to thank you for giving us so many fantastic characters over the years, my favourites being Uhtred and Thomas of Hookton. I have one question - when you are writing a series and get to the third installment do you ever have to go back and read the first to remind yourself of some of the smaller points in the story or do you have it "all in your head"?
Steve Bunn

A

Yes, I do whip back through the books to remind myself, but an awful lot is lodged in my head.


Q

I admire the historical accuracy of the Sharpe books, so I assume your depiction of the English officer class at the time is also accurate. My question is, with such incompetent officers, why was the army so successful? Was it because all other countries at the time had a similar process where nobles simply bought commissions? Regards, Peter Jennett

A

They weren't all incompetent! Lawford's fine, Forrest is good, Hogan is terrific, Wellington unbeatable . . . in fact there are a great number of very competent officers in the Sharpe books, just as there were in the real army at the time. There were also some amazing incompetents, really truly amazing idiots, which was inevitable considering the utter lack of officer training and the cumbersome promotion arrangements. Sharpe tends to meet a large share of the incompetents because otherwise the plots wouldn't work - but there are always some solid officers doing good work in the background - d'Alembord, Leroy, Jack Bullen, Robert Knowles . . . lots and lots of them!


Q

Dear Bernard i was recently reading up on the 95th on www.wikipedia.org due to reading your books and came across an interesting story about an Irish rifleman named Plunket who shot a french general at a range of between 400 and 800 yards and then at the same range shot a frenchman who came to the generals aid.What struck me as odd about the story was the description of the riflemans stance when he fired it was said that he lay on his back rifle butt under his right arm and barrel resting upon his crossed feet I found this an odd way to fire a rifle it was described as the regiments approved method of firing I wondered if this was a mistake or if you knew anything about this method of firing the rifle? Richard PS. Keep all the books coming they are all brilliant and very enjoyable and hope you will soon have Starbuck marching again.

A

No - that's exactly how Plunkett fired, and it was a recognised stance. Your crossed feet provided a rest for the rifle barrel, and though it sounds awkward it does actually work! I think, not sure, that Hagman does the same thing in Sharpe's Escape.


Q

Hi, I have just seen you in Waterstones, Bath. Several mentions were made of the Sharpe TV series, and its future. Are there any plans to televise any of your other books? The Arthur series would be ideal for TV. (Small armies of soldiers would be easier to portray than 120,000 soldiers at Waterloo!). All the best Simon

A

Not at the moment, but perhaps it will happen?