First of all I would like to add my congratulations on your OBE. It's nice to see them awarded to people who genuinely deseve them and not just sports personalities who haven't even won anything! I've just come back from a trip so i finally have the time to read Lords of the north. So far so good. I recently re-read the warlord chronicles, I still really love it but it's frustrating because so much stuff goes wrong in the story. My question is, despite the massive historical drawbacks were you at all tempted to change a few things, and make the outcome a bit happier? The characters didn't deserve what they got, and you know it! again, congrats. James Trethowan
But isn't that part of the appeal of the Arthurian stories - that despite the glory it all ends in tears? In fact I changed a lot - especially the Lancelot theme - but you can't muck about with the basic story, which is of ultimate defeat (Camlann) mitigated by hope (still alive in Avalon). In the end I was telling a story that everyone knows, so all I could hope to do was tell it in a fresh way, but if I had changed the essentials then most readers would have felt disappointed. If the three bears come home and find Goldilocks scoffing their porridge and decide that's all right, they were getting too fat anyway, and they really like having a blonde around and they all live happily ever after, then it ain't the real story, is it?